I have a box of cassette audio tapes that I want to convert to MP3 format. What's the simplest way to do it? I have a Windows 10 PC and a Nakamichi CR-2A cassette deck.
Please log in to post an answer.
As for this, maybe you could also take a try of DRmare Audio Recorder Software. It is a tool that can help you record the audios on your computer. That is to say, you need to play your cassette audios on your computer and then use DRmare program to record and convert those audios in MP3 audio format. Hope this tool will help you.
Thre is a very good little box made just for transferring LP's and CD's to MP3 or wave format. It's made by DAK and costs $69.90. See the link: www.dak.com/reviews/2021story.cfm
The box accepts stereo input from any source (including a microphone), provides for balance and loudness adjustment, digitizes it according to the resolution you want, and prepares a file for a CD. You can name the flie and see the audio as it is played. This is especially useful in that you can ensure that the signal is not being clipped. One can then run the file(s) through a hiss and click reduction program, which is especially good as it is based on an algorithm rather than just clipping spikes. Thus, it works on low amplitude as well as high amplitude signals.
The latest software also has a feature which will automatically take out the large gap one may have between sides of tapes or LPs, leaving only, say 3 seconds. I have found the whole process very satisfactory, though time consuming, as one must, of course, pay a certain amount of attention to whether the tape or LP is finished when doing the conversion. The ideal thing is to have two screens on your computer so you can keep your eye on the conversion process while doing other work on the other screen.
I have recently downsized and moved to a retirement home. I will never use the thing again. I can't find the software disk, though I have the program on my computer, of course. I would be happy to give you the box. DAK might sell you the latest version of the software.
Quite easy to do. You need to get a cable to go from the RCA jacks on your cassette deck to a stereo mini plug to go into your PC. Very common, but if you can't find one, then Amazon has them. Dynex A20420 and many others. For your purposes practically anything will do.
Then download Audacity, which in my humble opinion is the best audio editing program out there, especially since it is free. Go to www.audacityteam.org for the details. For MP3 export, you'll also need something called LAME, available on the Audacity site. Play your tapes into Audacity, then export them either as single songs-per-file or entire sides. For that matter, you can capture both sides of the tape, use Audacity to remove the dead areas that occur while changing sides. Or if you only like a couple of the songs, just copy-and-paste what you want.
If you don't need the absolute best in quality, the easiest way is to simply plug the line out from your cassette machine into the line in on your sound card. Most PCs/sound cards come with at least rudimentary software, or you can download Audacity, which is what I use. You will most likely need a stereo RCA to mini jack adapter, which are inexpensive, and available at RadioShack among other places. If you want a better quality conversion, you can get a phono/line in USB device. Make sure it supports both phono and line in. I purchased an NAD Digital Phono/USB Pream PP4 for transcribing my vinyl.
I use a Diamond One-touch that plugs into may Audio/Video player (RCA Jacks), and into a USB port. It does a great job, and software comes with it. I bought it about 2-3 years ago for $34.95. www.amazon.com/Diamond-VC500-Touch-Capture-Device/dp/B000VM60I8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1472941310&sr=8-1&keywords=Diamond+One-Touch
Assuming the cassette deck has LINE LEVEL outputs, use a stereo RCA-F to stereo 1/8" (3.5mm) adapter to directly feed the "LINE IN" (BLUE) jack on your motherboard. You'll then need a utility, like WIndows' "Sound Recorder". Load the tape into your recorder, start the recording utility, then start your tape deck. The file will be saved into, I believe, .WAV (wave) audio files, which you can convert to .MPG for use.
You can download Sound Recorder for Windows 10 from Microsoft. I suggest visiting sourceforge.net and perusing the open-source offerings ("Audacity" seems to be The Standard for audio recording).
A patch cable from the line output of the cassette deck to the line input of the computer. Should be available wherever you get stereo stuff, probably including Walmart.
Here are a couple of ways of recording your tapes.
After connecting your cassette deck to your sound card's line input and adjusting the input level on Control Panel, you can record the tapes with software. I use SoundForge 11 Pro. Unfortunately, this costs a few hundred dollars.
Another option is iZotope's line of products, but again, these are far from free. If you want open source software, download LAME. A friend of mine loves it. LAME is distributed as C source code only so you will need a C compiler. You can download GNU GCC compiler and install that.
All of these software solutions enable you to correct any audio problems after recording and save the corrected recordings in various formats. I use SoundForge to record 78 RPM records — not the 33 vinyls of the 1950s to present, but the shellac discs from 1895 to 1940s and on to 1954. The software removes ticks and pops and equalizes the frequency response appropriately.
Easiest thing to do would be to get a cable that will go between your tape deck and the computer. Usually (please check your connections) a dual male RCA plug to male 1/8" stereo plug will work. You can then plug this into your line in jack on your computer, and the line out jacks on your tape deck and get free software like Audacity to do the recording.
I recently discovered a cassette that my now-deceased father had recorded in 1998. He was whistling and playing a handmade wooden flute and I wanted to provide that to friends and family. I found the audio editing software "Audacity" after a search and it has worked well for me. It is free, open-source and will run on Windows, Mac, and Linux. You can download it at www.audacityteam.org. The documentation can be found at www.audacityteam.org/help/documentation. Very informative tutorials start at http://manual.audacityteam.org/#tutorials.
The first important part to figure out is how to connect the cassette deck to your computer. The whole process is explained well at http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/tutorial_your_first_recording.html and http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/how_to_connect_your_equipment.html. You will then, in a nutshell:
Note that: "Unfortunately, the algorithm to encode or create MP3 files is patented and Audacity would not be able to include an MP3 exporting algorithm without either charging a fee or potentially violating copyright law in some countries. As a compromise, Audacity comes with the ability to use other MP3 encoders, which you must download separately. It is up to you to make sure you are in compliance with any licensing restrictions imposed by MP3 encoders. To install LAME, see http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/faq_installation_and_plug_ins.html#lame".
I am editing my approximately 25 minutes of audio in the hopes of creating a CD. The tutorials explain that as well if you wish to try. Good luck.
I’m retired and re-learning electronics. I am confused about the differences between MOSFET and “regular” transistors. Is there a rule of thumb as to when/where/why you would use one over the other?
Please log in to post an answer.
Traditionally, MOSFETS were used for small-signal amplifiers and mixers, particularly at high frequencies. High currents or voltages would easily burn them out. Today there are power MOSFETS but they aren't very fast. So the existing MOSFETS tend to fall in two families: Fast but fragile, or strong but slow. Kind of like people.
My X-10 home automation gear has been reliable for years but just recently has become intermittent. Is there a way to test for what might be interfering with the operation?
Please log in to post an answer.
X-10 was developed back in the '70's as the first consumer power line carrier (PLC) home automation product. While newer and more robust systems are available, X10 remains popular due to its simplicity and low cost. Back in the '70's we didn't have the plethora of wall warts, PC/printer/monitor power supplies or CFL & LED bulbs, all of which tend to either absorb X10 signals or put noise on the power line or both!
All of these signal suckers and/or noise generators can swamp the X10 signal resulting in the problems you're experiencing. There are filters, amplifier/repeaters and couplers to resolve these issues and, I'm happy to report that, after over 30 years of using X10, I've been able to maintain reliable operation even in fairly large homes.
Before adding any of the above devices, the trick is to identify the source(s) of the problem. At the time the intermittent problem began, think about what changed in the house. A new TV, computer, monitor or phone/tablet charger? Conversion to CFL or LED bulbs? If any of those get a yes, try removing them and testing. Plug-in filters will help.
Does the problem only happen at certain times? For example, when my in-ground incandescent pool light burnt out I replaced it with an LED bulb. When it was on it generated sufficient noise to render X10 useless to a number of locations. The solution was to add a hash choke in series between the switched wire from the X10 module and the light. Problem solved.
Another very important consideration is coupling from one side of the power line to the other. As we all know, residential service consists of two 120 volt legs (L1 & L2) from the street transformer to the electrical panel where roughly half the circuits are served by each leg. Electric ovens, water heaters and central A/C units are connected to both legs to provide 240 volt service. If an X10 controller is plugged into an outlet on L1 and the lamp module is plugged into an outlet on L2, the signal needs to find a bridge to get from one leg to the other. That bridge can be a 240 volt appliance, if it's on, or the street transformer itself - a long run that attenuates the signal.
The solution is to use a coupler at the electrical panel to provide a reliable path for the signal to reach every circuit. The very best solution that will overcome a multitude of problems is the installation of an XTB-IIR which is both a coupler and X-10 signal amplifier. It's available both as a kit or fully assembled from www.jvde.us. Building the kit is within the capabilities of most Nuts & Volts readers. That site offers a number of solutions and some great tutorials on X10 troubleshooting. I've been using both their site as a resource and their products for many years with great success.
I was having the same problem, with flakier and flakier performance. Some online research indicates that the problem is the result of the ever-increasing number of AC power line operated digital devices we use, each of which can feed noise back into the power line, potentially causing problems for other devices.
To prevent this, AC power line connections use a lot of filtering components (inductors and bypass capacitors) to prevent the digital noise from traveling back into the AC power line, but the bypass capacitors essentially short circuit the 120 kHz X-10 signals so they can't reach the devices they are intended to control. It's time to switch to Z-wave or one of the other radio-based control systems.
The X-10 protocol is passed at voltage zero, which makes it subject to other devices that operate at voltage zero. Did you add any electronic controls (lights, motor controller, etc) to your home? If you Google X-10 problems, you will get many possible solutions. Also, did you have any electrical work done at your house recently? If so look into the capacitor bridge to see if this helps. Also, look into possible noise sources (electric motors, SRC controls, etc.) as these may be producing sufficient noise to interfere with the X-10 signals.
You can get a "Powerline Signal Analyzer" but they cost $$$$. What I found was after many years of using X10, it became unusable due to interference. Do you have any UPSs at your location? They can be causing interference. Smarthome has wire-in filters that will help as well as plug in ones.
I am looking to experiment with “ultra capacitors” as a replacement for AA batteries. Is this possible to do and, if so, what kind of capacitors would be a good place to start?
Please log in to post an answer.
The short answer is NO. The main function of Ultra caps is for TEMPORARY backup of memory type devices (i.e., clocks in DVD players) during brief (i.e., less than a day) power outages. They are NOT suitable, nor designed, to replace batteries simply because, as they are electrolytic capacitors, they need recharging when their stored energy is depleted. Also, they're not really designed for current loads greater than a couple hundred microamps. This subject has come up a few times in the past couple of years and I believe N&V had an article comparing ultra caps to batteries (primary and rechargeable).
This is only practical when the current draw is very low. A coulomb is one amp-second. By definition a one-Farad capacitor charged to five volts can deliver five coulombs. A single AA battery can deliver at least 1350 coulombs. This is because the material of the battery is consumed when it is delivering current. The capacitor isn't consumed, it's just a tank for electricity. About the only practical use of a small ultracapacitor is to maintain a CMOS memory while the set is unplugged.
I have done this. I'm going to put the conclusion right up front for those not interested in reading the rest of this. Given the present prices for AA batteries and ultracapacitors, it makes no economic sense to do this at this time. But I rarely let such considerations stop me from having fun.
Ultracapacitors and AA batteries both store energy. How much? For a capacitor, the energy stored is 1/2 * C * V^2 where C is the capacitance in Farads, and V is the voltage across the cap in Volts. One farad-volt^2 is one Joule of energy. I take a Maxwell Technologies BCAP1500 P270 as an example. This is a 1,500 Farad, 2.7 Volt capacitor. It is cylindrical in shape and with a diameter of 2.4 inches and a height of 4.5 inches. Volume = 20.36 cubic inches. It is a little smaller than a soda can. When charged to 1.5 Volts it has 0.5*1500*1.5*1.5 = 1,687 Joules of energy. When charged to it's maximum 2.7 Volts is has 5,467 Joules. These cost $59.20 at Digi-Key in quantity of 1.
Batteries are not usually rated by the energy they store, but this can be figured out. I take a RadioShack AA NiMH rechargeable battery as an example. These are cylindrical in shape with a diameter of 0.55 inches and a height of 2 inches. Volume = 0.5 cubic inches. Batteries are rated in Amp-hours. These are 2.5 Amp-Hours or 2500 mA-Hours. To equate this to an amount of energy, I enlist a theoretical load that draws 125 mA regardless of the voltage applied. One can make an actual load like this using a current source, but it must be able to work at these low voltages.
Starting fully charged, I run this for 20 Hours. I note that the average output voltage of the battery during the run is 1.2 Volts. I do the following calculations: Average output power = 1.2 Volts x 0.125 Amps = 150 mWatt. Energy used = .15 x 20 = 3 Watt-Hours. There are 3,600 Joules in one Watt-Hour so Energy used = 10,800 Joules. These batteries cost $19.95 for a set of four, so they are $5.00 each. Also note that a battery will hold its output voltage fairly steady until it is close to fully discharged. When using a capacitor, the output voltage will decrease in a linear fashion as current is drawn. For a capacitor i = C * dv/dt so dv/dt = i/C where i is current, C is capacitance in farads and dv/dt is the rate of change of voltage.
Using the above numbers if I start at 1.4 Volts (1,470 Joules in the capacitor) and I have to stop at 1.0 Volts (750 Joules left in the capacitor) because my "load" (a portable radio for example) will not work below 1.0 Volts, then I have only gotten 720 Joules out of the capacitor. If my "load" can operate without problems at 2.7 Volts, then between 2.7 volts and 1.0 volts I can get 4,717 Joules (86% of a full charge) from the capacitor per cycle.
One of the great disadvantages of a battery is that any rechargeable battery has a cycle limit. Battery manufacturers don't like to point this out but one can only charge and discharge a battery so many times before it losses its ability to hold a charge and has to be replaced. It depends on conditions but I have seen numbers between 300 to 1,000 cycles. Whether this is important depends on what you are doing. This is where a ultracapacitor can really shine. According to the Maxwell data sheet, one can cycle these ultracapacitors one million times and it will not lose more than 20% of its initial capacity.
Battery Energy
Ultracapacitor Energy
Not looking good for the ultracapacitors.
Now let's switch to discussing an actual experiment. I was in a local discount store when I found some "Floating Ball Solar Light" gadgets. As an impulse buy, I bought three of these things. These consist of a clear plastic ball about 6 inches in diameter. Inside this clear plastic ball is what I will call a solar lantern. This is a translucent cylinder about 2.5 inches tall and 1.75 inches in diameter with a plate at the top and a plate at the bottom. On top of the top plate is a small square solar cell 1.75 inches square. Below the bottom plate is a small compartment. At the very bottom of the sphere there is a small rubber gasket that actually covers a push-on-push-off button which allows one to turn these things off when not in use.
My wife thought these things were the cat's meow as they floated around the pool glowing softly in the evenings. They each had different colors of LEDs in them. Unfortunately they only lasted a few days until the internal batteries went dead and they stopped working and went in the junk box.
Two other notes, locating the on-off switch at the bottom, below the waterline was a bad idea as the gasket tended to leak. The outer sphere was actually two hemi-spheres that were glued together at the equator. This also tended to leak allowing rainwater in.
A few weeks later I took one and cut it apart. Inside is a single LED that illuminates the lantern. In the base is a small PCB with a single "glop top" IC. The battery leads were soldered to the terminals of a AAA battery. I unsoldered the leads and disposed of the old battery. I made some measurements. Under conditions of darkness, the LED draws about 10 mA. Under conditions of full sunlight the solar cell can produce 38 mA of current. On the surface, it would seem this should work.
I wired a 1500 Farad ultracapacitor to the battery leads and set the unit out in the sun for a day. The ultracapitor had about 1.4 volts on it which is enough to keep the LED glowing all night long. I can't leave the unit outdoors for a long term test because it is not waterproof in its present state. I can't put it back together like it was because the ultracapacitor is 40 times bigger than the battery it is replacing. I'm sure that like all electronic components, ultracapacitors will get smaller and cheaper over time, but they have a way to go to match batteries. I hate to buy batteries because I know they will go dead and have to be replaced in a few years at most. There is a strong psychological appeal to something that you can buy once and have it last for your whole lifetime.
If ultracapacitors down get down to a size where they would fit where existing batteries fit, then they might start to displace existing batteries. At present ultracapacitors are used in other applications.